Departments urge end to Western manipulation of ‘press freedom’
China urged some politicians from the West to stop political manipulation of the judiciary under the pretext of “press freedom” after they made irresponsible remarks regarding the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) court’s trial of the criminal case involving two editors of “Stand News.”
Being the first incitement case involving a media organization since the return of Hong Kong to the motherland 27 years ago, the case is a just move to safeguard national security and the rule of law in Hong Kong, providing important precedent for similar cases that may be tried in the future and on how media organizations exercise the right of press freedom in compliance with the law, observers said.
China deplores and opposes a handful of countries and institutions exploiting the judicial case in the Hong Kong SAR to vilify Hong Kong and interfere in China’s internal affairs, Lin Jian, a spokesperson from the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said on Friday.
“Let me stress that the rights and freedoms Hong Kong residents enjoy in accordance with law, including freedom of press, are fully protected. This is an undeniable fact. Meanwhile, Hong Kong upholds the rule of law where to abide by the law and bring lawbreakers to justice is a basic principle. Freedom of press is by no means a shield for illegal activities,” Lin said.
The Commissioner’s Office of China’s Foreign Ministry in Hong Kong, the Chinese Embassy in the UK, and the Chinese Mission to the EU also expressed their dissatisfaction with the irresponsible remarks regarding the case made by some Western politicians.
Stand News editors-in-chief Chung Pui-kuen and Lam Shiu-tung, and Best Pencil (Hong Kong) Limited – the company that operated Stand News – were guilty of conspiring to publish seditious articles, the Hong Kong SAR government said on Thursday, citing the District Court.
The Commissioner’s Office slammed the Western politicians for having long-held double standards on so-called “press freedom” issue. They turn a blind eye to their own country’s deplorable record of suppressing the news media, but have repeatedly used “press freedom” as a political tool to justify anti-China and anti-Hong Kong organizations, and wantonly smear and attack the rule of law and fair justice in the SAR.
Refuting accusations from some Western politicians, Kennedy Wong Ying-ho, a solicitor of the High Court of Hong Kong, told the Global Times on Friday that they are merely trying to “confuse right and wrong and mislead the public.”
He said that Hong Kong residents enjoy freedom of the press, the normal operation of media organizations is also protected by law, and Hong Kong laws also clearly define the provisions on “sedition.” The provision will not affect or harm press freedom.
The court’s decision has added a precedent to Hong Kong’s judicial system, providing important reference for similar cases that may be tried in the future and provide guidance on how to exercise the right of press freedom in compliance with the law, Wong said.
GT
