Anchorage meeting to reset China-US ties cautiously; China welcomes problem solving rather than wrangling

By Yang Sheng, Chen Shasha and Li Sikun

An upcoming “2+2” meeting between China’s and the US’ chief diplomats and senior officials in charge of foreign affairs is scheduled to be held March 18-19. Chinese experts said China welcomed the intention for dialogue from the new administration led by Joe Biden, but stressed that such a high-level meeting should focus on solving problems.

Observers reached by the Global Times on Thursday said that this first step for resetting China-US ties has been scheduled earlier than expected, which creates cautious optimism.

At the invitation of the US, Yang Jiechi, a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee and director of the Office of the Foreign Affairs Commission of the CPC Central Committee, and Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi, will meet US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan March 18-19 in Anchorage, Alaska for a high-level strategic dialogue, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian announced on Thursday.

China urges the US to view China and China-US relations in an objective way, stop interfering in China’s internal affairs, and bring China-US relations back to the right track, Zhao said, responding to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s comment on the upcoming talk.

According to the released information, Chinese experts said it’s confirmed that the US was the one to send invitation, and the location is in a US state far from its mainland, since the US understands the sensitivity of such a meeting with China, but also needs to engage with China as soon as possible. This proves that the US is being very careful and highly values ties with China, since it wouldn’t meet with China unless it’s fully prepared.

The US Department of State released the same information on Wednesday.

Jin Canrong, associate dean of the School of International Studies at the Renmin University of China, told the Global Times on Thursday that the Biden administration obviously needs this meeting more than China does, so the US released the information quickly.

“The Biden administration is at least better than the previous one as they are willing to talk with us. China has sincerity for rebuilding ties, so no matter what the result might be, the intention for dialogue is always welcomed,” Jin said.

Yang Xiyu, senior research fellow at the China Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times on Thursday that Alaska is a suitable venue for an attempt for China and the US to cautiously make the initial step to reset ties.

“Compared with the other 48 states on its mainland, Alaska and Hawaii are less politically sensitive. In the past, direct flights from Beijing to New York or Washington in the US mainland had to stop at Anchorage. So this city has special significance in the history of China-US relations,” Yang noted.

The meeting will take place following Blinken’s meetings with two of the US’ “closest regional allies in Tokyo and Seoul,” but the US didn’t specify what issues will be discussed in the meeting with Chinese officials, according to the US State Department.

Yang said that small players are always worried that they might be betrayed or used for exchanges on the table of the big players, so before the talks with China, the US has to pacify its allies, and at least confirm the stances held by Tokyo and Seoul to make sure they will follow the US. “This will give some cards to the US at the negotiating table with China.”

Jin said the Biden administration has attached great importance to the US-led alliance system, and some US allies are waiting for “the latest instructions from their boss,” and some, like Australia, have already been seriously punished by China due to the extreme hostility of the previous Trump administration, so the US needs to show them a new attitude toward China.

Sincerity needed

By unilaterally releasing the information one day earlier than China did, the US wants to gain some advantage, because if the meeting doesn’t take place or the result is not positive, the US could let the world to blame China, said Shen Yi, a professor at Fudan University’s School of International Relations and Public Affairs, adding that China takes no responsibility for worsening bilateral ties, so if the US wants to normalize the relationship, it should be sincerer.

Jin said the US should understand that China wants some problems to be solved rather than just have some arguments with the US, otherwise a phone call would be enough, so if the two sides can’t reach concrete agreement to solve some problems that China is concerned about, and if China just receives another round of “lecturing” from US officials in Alaska, the meeting would be pointless.

At the Lanting Forum held jointly by the China Public Diplomacy Association, Peking University and the Renmin University of China in Beijing last month, former US senior officials and scholars put forward a number of specific suggestions on the proposal raised by State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi to form lists for cooperation and issues requiring dialogue and crisis management between China and the US.

US scholars and former senior officials suggested that China and the US can cooperate in fighting COVID-19, climate change and boosting global economic recovery.

The issues that need to be addressed between China and the US mainly consist of three parts – the dangerous confrontation problems that could escalate into actual conflict, including the Taiwan question and the South China Sea; the competitive issues on trade, science and technology and the struggle for influence in various regions worldwide; and issues which require cooperation , said Chinese experts.

Yang Xiyu said the Biden administration has announced their four most prioritized missions – to fight COVID-19, to boost economic recovery, to handle climate change and to solve the racial problem. “Apart from the racial problem, three issues need international cooperation, especially cooperation with the world’s second biggest economy, China.”

However, the Biden administration and the US Congress have also sent some other complicated signals ahead of the meeting announced by the US. These include provocative comments on China’s reform for Hong Kong’s electoral system, and the sensitive issue of the Dalai Lama that is related to China’s Tibet.

On Wednesday, a US Navy guided-missile destroyer plowed through the Taiwan Straits, marking the third passage of an American naval vessel through the Straits since Biden took office.

Shen said the Biden administration obviously won’t give up many adversarial approaches, and we should not expect China and the US to solve every problem in just one meeting. He also noted that the China-US relations will continue to be a complexity of competition, adversary and cooperation.

Yang from China Institute of International Studies said the US has never given up its efforts to prevent China from realizing a peaceful rise, so the two countries will talk to each other, but the US won’t change its objective of containing China’s development and preventing China from surpassing the US.

New ‘2+2’ mechanism

In the past, China and the US have tried to carry out the “2+2” dialogues between officials in charge of foreign affairs and national defense, but this time, the “2+2” meeting is different from those in the past, and could become a normal dialogue mechanism, experts said.

“There are many issues that both sides can talk about from the perspective of diplomacy and national security strategy, and such a mechanism better suits the needs for dialogue between decision-making levels,” Yang said.

Yang noted, “This meeting would be significant in general, and since there are so many problems, we won’t see the effect instantly. But it could at least pave a way for the reset of China-US relations.”

If the new mechanism becomes institutionalized, it would provide a great opportunity to bring predictability and stability in the most consequential bilateral ties in the world, he said. “Let’s see whether the two sides will be able to take the opportunity.”

Global Times

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *