US cap on Chinese media employees shows lack of confidence in its system: Chinese experts

US cap on Chinese media employees shows lack of confidence in its system: Chinese experts

By Zhang Hui and Xu Keyue

 

The US move to cap Chinese media employee numbers in the US is a nasty and selfish attempt to divert attention away from frustrations over domestic issues and vent anti-China sentiment at Chinese journalists, which is not the act of a responsible superpower and reveals the US’ diminishing confidence in its own system, analysts said Tuesday.

They said that China may not resort to equivalent countermeasures, but will strengthen communication and personal exchanges with US residents and organizations, to show a true, peaceful and inclusive China and to prevent bilateral relations from being manipulated by some anti-China US elites.

US State Department officials said Monday that a personnel cap is being imposed on four Chinese media companies – China Radio International,  China Daily Distribution Corporation, China Global Television Network and Xinhua – forcing them to limit the number of their Chinese employees in the US to 100 in total, from 160. The Wall Street Journal said the latest move is “in retaliation for years of tightening restrictions on American news outlets by Beijing.”

Chinese experts said that the US’ latest move serves as a “retaliation” for China revoking the press credentials of three Wall Street Journal journalists, and also as one of its cards to contain China.

The  US is politicizing the normal activities of the Chinese media in the US, which shows that the US is politicizing many non-political issues with regard to China affairs, with the purpose of using the “whole-of-government” method to tackle the so-called “China threat”, Diao Damin, an associate professor at the Renmin University of China, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

The US’ latest move came after the US last month started to treat the four mentioned Chinese media outlets and Hai Tian Development USA, Inc with US operations the same as foreign embassies, requiring them to register their employees and US properties with the US State Department.

Reducing the number of Chinese journalists in the US is not conducive to the Chinese and American people getting to know each other in a timely and accurate way, leading to increased miscalculations between the two countries which will further complicate China-US relations, Li Haidong, a professor at the China Foreign Affairs University, told the Global Times.

The US attempt to wage a media war against China reflects the fact that it is becoming less and less confident in its system as it is no longer tolerant of other countries’ normal activities in the US, Li said.

As for whether China will take similar measures against US media employees in China, Li said that China will take actions against them if they actually violate Chinese laws and professional ethics, but will not blindly take actions out of “retaliation” like the US side.

China revoked the press credentials of three Beijing-based journalists from the Wall Street Journal after the newspaper published an article with a “racist headline,” which called China the “sick man of Asia,” and refused to apologize.

Instead of retaliation, China will urge US media outlets to report more truthfully on China-related incidents, as China always adopts an open and inclusive attitude, Zhang Yiwu, a cultural expert from Peking University, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

At Monday’s press conference, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian stressed that China always welcomes foreign media to report about the country in a comprehensive and objective way, and has been providing support and conveniences for international journalists to report about China in accordance with international practices and laws.

What happened to journalists from the Wall Street Journal was extremely rare, and the organization should draw lessons from it, Zhao said, noting that  for the more than 600 foreign reporters in China, there is no need to worry as long as they abide by Chinese laws and report in accordance with regulations.

Source:Global Times

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *