—- Prem Sagar Poudel
The South China Sea intermediation court established according to Philipines one sided request has decided on 12th July which we protest it strictly. And we obviously support the China’s insist and abrogate that decision, the press statement of the foreign ministry on the decision on South China Sea intermediation case, China government’s statement about sovereignty of South China Sea and Sea right. Islands in South China Sea’s sovereiegnty are China. China has historical right over South China Sea. No country, organization has denied the Chinese right and regional sovereignty over South China Sea. That’s why it is not obligatory to follow this decision. Chinese government’s insist on this decision has supported by the Chinese public congress foreign ministry committee. The decision has violated the law between different aspect’s announcement letter and UN Sea law conference too.
International law seminar has organized to solve Sea conflict in HongKong China. We clearly support the views of different scholars’ from many countries about the decision which has many faults that evokes the problem more serious. Phillipines has presented the decision which is given by the South China Sea temporary intermediation court and has so many mistakes. The decision could not solve the problem about the current conflict. In fact Phillipines should settle down this conflict peacefully and co operatively.
Chinese defense ministry’s spokesperson Mr. Yang has proved about Chinese government’s assist is same as before about the 12th July decision of Phillipines South China Sea. He added whatever the decision China does not have any bad effect about South China Sea’s sovereignty and welfare. He cleared that Chinese armies protect country’s sovereignty, safety and right over sea and welfare primarily. We clearly support and welcome the view of Chinese defense ministry’s statement.
According to UN international court’s judge Say Han said that the problem has not solved about the case sovereignty and sea boarder by the intermediation court. That’s why the intermediation court does not have sufficient proof said president of international law research center and Ran Pemmarju ex-president of international law committee. It is cleared that Chinese oppositions wanted to interrupt on South China Sea’s right by conspiracy. We opposed and calumniated over the planned conspiracy and illegal step to divide the Tibet from China and snatched the right over South China sea from China. We support and stand for China at the end.
Chinese government has given the statement frequently and assisted that it was not acceptable and they were not participated in it, they will ignore the decision and will not follow before 12th July from ex-Phillipines government has formally published the intermediation court’s decision one sided on South China Sea. We would like to thanks for openly supporting Chinese government’s assist by so many countries and international society, all countries’ government, political parties and different organizations, and we express heartily to support Chinese step.
Published Date : July 18, 2016
